Everyone pretty much agrees that immersive elearning is better than simpler, linear, click-ahead elearning. Or maybe not.

We've sometimes experienced unexpected client angst when developing more immersive courses. Discomfort that immersive production takes longer. Concern that an immersive approach makes for longer learner seat time. Confusion that not every option in a simulation is black and white.

So maybe we should address the shifting paradigms that must accompany successful immersive elearning. Five immediately come to mind:

1. The point of immersive elearning is to slow the learner down, so that the learning sticks. Evaluating, studying, practicing...all take more time than skimming content just to get to the assessment. But while immersed, longer times actually seem like shorter times.
2. Immersive development time is greater than the time it takes to create click-ahead content. More time for the client, the SME, the instructional designer, and the developer. Create structure and processes that keep you focused and working more efficiently.
3. Instructional design for immersive elearning is more than linear content dressed up with avatars and games. You will have to fight to reorganize the way you think, to do this right. It requires more insight, and more levels subtlety to create a successful learner experience.
4. We learn best by doing. When you get right down to it, we learn by failing. If you are not providing the learner with practice at making decisions, and failing, you are missing out on a powerful tool.
5. When using avatars (and you should use avatars) don't use them simply as eye candy. Use them to create a social interaction, which will be engaging as it builds trust in your training brand. Use them, as with a valuable mentor or coach, to build better relationships with your learners.