COMMENTS
As an experienced online developer and animator I have researched and tried using the these avatars with real audio narration and text-to-audio systems..
My conclusion is that they improve learning because of the AUDIO with GRAPHIC method. That is where two communication channels are used simulatenously (like video/audio) whch is better than text alone.
It's not better learning because a cute character bounces around on stage: an arrow can do that. A character is a distractor from the content.
Cute characters take programming time to develop. Better use your time to make the content and course better designed.
So, Kevin, you don't buy into the social aspect of a character at all? Despite the different Stanford studies? A simple audio track along with a graph would do the trick? How about shooting me a link for something to look at, along that line?
Jack, I think your points here are well made; esp as the 10 points come out of the Stanford study. Personally, I see lots of potential in points #9 and 10 as I think affect can be bounced upwards w/avatars (those that are well done) and I do think that navigation enhancements will become more tied to avatars as the technology improves. I also like the thought of leveraging avatars in kiosks and other help systems one might find in malls, amusement parks, etc.
Thanks for your comments, Chris. There's no question in our experience that the avatars have an impact with learners. In fact, you might want check out some survey results we have in an additional post, on this site.
http://blog.wslash.net/bid/6538/Phenomenal-Response-Immersive-Learning-Simulations
But the MOST value we've seen, I should underscore, is the realism that avatars lend to
practicing. People learn best by doing, not reading. So creating simulations where the learner actually practices making decisions, while interacting with a character...that's the highest value, in my mind.
Jack, you're right ON! Simulations that enable trainees to develop and practice skills, to prepare for practicing with patients, are in the mode of preparedness for unexpected events – think 'Sully' Sullenberger!
Thanks, LeRoy. Say, what do you do at Stanford?