COMMENTS
Jack, With the results that you've described above, why aren't more companies turning to this type of learning. It seems that with an approx. avg. of 12.5% increase in sales (which is an impressive number by the way)more companies would be turning to this type of learning for their sales force. What are your thoughts? Is it just because it's a new concept and companies are leery of change?
Well I don't agree with you on e-learning Jack. Although I do agree with the examples you quote above on basic learning skills, but what is wrong if we apply these skills on e-learning? I believe online degree or e-learning just give flexibility to learn, when and where possible.
Well I don't agree with you on e-learning Jack. Although I do agree with the examples you quote above on basic learning skills, but what is wrong if we apply these skills on e-learning? I believe online degree or e-learning just give flexibility to learn, when and where possible.
Good stuff Jack. Do you think there are certain places where traditional (page-based) e-learning is a better approach than a PowerSim?
I agree to a certain extent that some e-learning courses just don't work...but then some face to face courses just don't work either. It really is up to the facilitator/instructor/teacher. E-learning doesn't need to be shoehorned into powerpoint or an LMS (although if used correctly and or creatively can be very successful) and can be just a leveraging of the thousands of web 2.0 products out there to facilitate a self directed, collaborative,rich learning experience for the learner.
It really is lots of work but if a teachers focus is on the students learning then it is worth it.
Thanks for the thoughtful comments...and let me respond, briefly.
First, I believe that well done e-learning is a great way to learn...even better than ILT, as some research has indicated. But my point is, most e-learning is done poorly. At that point the results aren't worth the investment...and that makes it just wrong.
As to times where a page turner might work, rather than a simulation...you're still just talking about e-reading, not e-learning. Now, if it's reference content that you're talking about, there may not be a call for simulations, but then the format isn't necessarily page-by-page, either. A search format, or indexing navigation scheme would be more appropriate.
Keep the comments coming...
Missy...I didn't get to answer for you in my last post, so..
I think we'll see more and more sales training done this way, but it depends on the practitioners to bring this option to the table. When I talk to sales training managers, the value proposition always hits them hard...and positively.
It is illogical to label an inanimate item as 'wrong'. False dichotomies, such as the one you attempt to set up, do nothing to add to the benefits, or otherwise, of e-Learning.
e-Learning may be mis-applied; it may be correctly applied to teaching and learning.
It can never be '...plain wrong...'
Thanks for the feedback, Ian. Did you also have an opinion that you forgot to share?
To do e-Learning right, it takes thought, effort, time, and budget. In a corporate environment where the focus is on getting things 'done' rather than 'right', i.e. checking it off your list of things to do, then I can see where companies want to spend the least amount of thought, effort, time and money on e-Learning. I think there is a misconception that e-Learning is just a quick, cheap way to disseminate information.