w/ custom e-learning solutions :: e-learning NOT as usual
 

Subscribe by Email

Your email:

 

Bookmark and Share

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Web 2.0...2.0 hard, or 2.0 good to pass up?

Submit to Digg digg it | Submit to Reddit reddit | Add to delicious delicious | Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon 

Andrew McAfee Keynote at DevLearn 09Professor Andrew McAfee (left) just finished his keynote Enterprise 2.0: The State of an Art at DevLearn 09. He emphasized that web 2.0 isn't something to miss out on and shared some convincing survey and case study results as proof (I promise to share more on these in a future blog post).

He also made the case for getting out of the way, if you're going to be successful with web 2.0. For instance, stop obsessing about the risks, and also, keep things simple. McAfee made a great point for not getting trapped in credentialism (despite the fact that he has five degrees) but rather, trusting in the wisdom of the crowd.

Now, let's take the next step forward, together...

In light of both McAfee's comments, and your own experience, please share with us what issues might have kept you from embracing web 2.0 in the past. The poll widget below is live, so you'll get immediate feedback on what others have been experiencing in their organizations.


Survey Results - GlowDay.com

Okay! Now that you've seen the poll results, please leave your comments about what you might do differently, based on McAfees remarks (and other things you're learning here at DevLearn 09...

(Andrew McAfee is Principle Research Scientest at the MIT Sloan School of Management. He studies how information technology (IT) affects businesses and how IT changes the way companies perform, organize themselves, and compete. He coined the phrase “Enterprise 2.0” in a spring 2006 Sloan Management Review article to describe the use of Web 2.0 tools and approaches by businesses. McAfee is author or co-author of more than fifteen scholarly articles, ninety case studies, and other materials for students and teachers of technology, and his book on Enterprise 2.0 is publishing in 2009. Andrew holds a Doctorate from Harvard Business School, and two M.S. and two B.S. degrees from MIT.)

Tags: , ,

COMMENTS

I have repeatedly asked clients about Learning 2.0. The vast majority give the same answers: 1) tracking is a nightmare, 2) there is a big startup hurdle, 3) "blogs are full of misinformation". Really. 
 
I have tried to explain that the second two are not at all realistic, but I am met with blank stares and comments like "wikipedia is unreliable" "so-and-so blog is garbage so learning 2.0 won't work and can't be trusted". I have discussed vetting sites and so forth, but to no avail.  
 
Tracking is a real problem for some places. There are workarounds, though.  
 
The biggest problem seems to be that management and even lower decision makers are misinformed so I voted for misunderstanding and mistrust.

posted @ Saturday, November 14, 2009 1:11 PM by John


Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics

Receive email when someone replies.